hi Helmut, On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 04:35:18PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > What I actually meant was the set of packages used by debootstrap, but I > wrote essential.
ah! > In essence, this is "Priority: required". I'm not sure > about "Priority: important" yet. debootstrap seems to reliably configure > all required packages before unpacking important packages and that may > be sufficient to be safe. Rule of thumb: If your package is in the > "Priority: required" set and has an aliased file, do expect me to send a > patch. :) fwiw, required is also only 27 source packages. and important adds another 27 as well. btw, this made me aware that we (r-b.o) didn't track that, so thanks to this thread there's https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/pkg_set_important.html now and in future! > > a mail or a bug? is there a user tag? > A d-devel thread Cced to all relevant maintainers. > https://lists.debian.org/20230912181509.ga2588...@subdivi.de thanks! > We're talking about: > * base-files > * bash > * coreutils maybe > * dash > * libc6 > * util-linux ok, those are kinda important. ;) > > many thanks for all your work on this! > You are welcome. & many thanks to everyone else involved too! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ 20230709: Today was the warmest day on earth in 125,000 years. Today was also the day with the most planes in the air at one time ever in history. By the time you read this both of these records have probably been broken.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
