On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:33:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > And my proposal for checking that set, since we're only talking about > runtime library packages, is to check whether any of the contents of these > packages in bookworm match ^/lib - as a runtime library package NOT matching > this pattern, but matching a pattern for one of the other aliased > directories, would be something ... special.
Binary packages in bookworm shipping libs in /lib* (i.e. /lib, /lib32,
/lib64):
$ ssh -C coccia.debian.org zcat \
/srv/mirrors/debian/dists/bookworm/'*'/Contents-armhf.gz \
| awk -F/ '/^lib.*\.so/ { print $NF }' | sort -u | wc -l
222
$
Binary packages in experimental that are to be renamed:
$ for pkg in $(cat reports/lfs-and-depends-time_t reports/runtime-libs); do \
sed -n -e"s/Package: \($pkg\)$/\1/p" \
/var/lib/apt/lists/*experimental*Packages; \
done | sort -u | wc -l
130
$
$ join -j1 usrmerge-libs experimental-libs
libpam0g
$
<cough>
I'll follow up on that.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
