James A.Treacy writes ("Re: Aiding the constitutional procedure [was Re: Automation of the constitutional procedure]"): > [Dale:] > > While I agree with the merrits of your previous arguments, I don't see > > what this has to do with the constitution. The secretary has "powers" > > which allow the secretary to execute that office. > > As long as section 4.2.5 is not violated then you are quite right. > I was simply over-reacting to the tone in Ian's response.
Section 4.2(5) is violated only if the Secretary requires developers to propose motions &c by mailing their bot in a special format, rather than by posting a normal message to debian-devel (or whatever other list we end up using). The Secretary can of course maintain the data in such a bot themselves, if they want to. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]