On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 11:01 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/23/24 04:32, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > > > > It could be argued that testing migration is a CI process. >> > > > > Its a CI process at a way too late stage. > > > Also, uploading to test a merge request is not the right thing to > > > do. > > > If the archive is a VCS then uploading an untested package to > > experimental > > to run tools is pushing a commit to run CI. > > *shrug* > > Yes, but unironically: experimental is a side branch, unstable is a > MR, > and testing is the main branch. > > It is entirely valid to be dissatisfied with the turnaround time of > the > existing CI, but what we're seeing here is the creation of a parallel > structure with as-of-yet unclear scope.
You are wasting a lot of hardware resources we don't have by abusing experimental as a CI. Don't do that. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F