On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 21:57, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:36:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 18:16, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:23:43 +0100, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >The vast majority of people who
> >> >are forced to use emails do so for work via a
> >> >work-mediated/administered interface that tries to make it somewhat
> >> >tolerable, like Outlook or Gmail.
> >>
> >> This must be the least accurate statement about Outlook that I have
> >> ever read. Outlook does not have a single feature that makes email
> >> more tolerable in any way. Au contraire. The feature called threading
> >> is incompatible with the rest of the world and not even very useful in
> >> an outlook-only environment, the search function finds everything but
> >> the mail you're looking for, and Outlook's disability to quote
> >> decently is notorious for having led to the whole world generating
> >> only top-posting replies.
> >>
> >> Outlook is essentially responsible for making email so much worse
> >> today than it was in the 1990s.
> >>
> >> Even Salsa's and github's praised way to communitate in an MR is
> >> VASTLY inferior to a decently threading mail client like mutt or even
> >> Thunderbird.
> >>
> >> I violently disagree with the rest of the message as well and am not
> >> willing to spoil the rest of my day by replying in detail. I'd prefer
> >> learning a bit more Slowfoxtrot later tonight.
> >
> >Again, please understand that outside of the bubble of tech nerds of
> >the 70s/80s, saying out loud phrases such as "The only right way to
> >collaborate is reading and writing emails is in my terminal" means
> >getting looked at like being a dinosaur just escaped from a museum.
> >The rest of the universe just doesn't work like that, sorry. There's
> >nothing wrong with being a dinosaur for an individual of course, we
> >will all become one at some point, but optimizing for making dinosaurs
> >happy from the simple perspective of demographics is a sure way for a
> >project to slowly slide into irrelevance. The fact that the project
> >membership has just about managed to remain flat while the tech sector
> >absolutely exploded in size should send shivers down everyone's
> >spines.
>
> Now that you have added personal insult while not adding anything for
> the cause, I recuse myself from continuing this situation. I am happy
> that I don't need to collaborate with you in my Debian efforts.

What are you on about? What personal insult?

Reply via email to