Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> > libjpeg have different sonames.)
> How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
> binary compatibility?
One small correction: the libpng issue wasn't a soname problem,
RedHat's libpng.so wasn't explicitly linked against libz.so, so Debian
programs _might_ not run on RedHat (without an LD_PRELOAD), but RedHat
programs run fine on Debian.
The soname issues are with libjpeg, libgdbm, libncurses.
Debian Redhat
============== ============
libjpeg.so.6a libjpeg.so.6
libgdbm.so.1 libgdbm.so.2
libncurses.so.3.4 libncurses.so.3.0
One other problem is that libcompface is static on Red Hat and dynamic
on Debian, but this library is rarely used. (All of these were
discovered when I tried to move a "stow" tree of XEmacs Beta 20.5 from
a Debian system to a Red Hat system.)
For now, most of these issues can be resolved by using symlinks. But
sonames should be synchronized with Red Hat in the future.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
