On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 09:52:07AM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote: > register-window-manager [pathname] > with no arguments, enters interactive mode > with one pathname argument, invokes interactive mode with "add" action > and pathname already done, thus prompting for priority (see below) > > Could we instead have a default priority assigned to each window > manager? So postinst scripts would run it like this: > > register-window-manager pathname priority > > and the script would add in the new window manager and report which > one currently has the highest priority. The sysadmin could still > start it in interactive mode to rearrange the priorities.
Well, as said, everything will default to the bottom of the list (lowest priority). I don't think it will buy us very much for me to hard-code priorities for various window managers into register-window-manager, only to see the majority of users change them (as they should). "Externalizing" the standard priorities and having them passed to register-window-manager by the various WM's postinsts is A) too difficult to coordinate and B) wouldn't get us very much, I don't think. Remember, /etc/X11/window-managers is *only* used if the person using startx or logging in with XDM has no ~/.xsession file, which I image most experienced X users have. This file is just a way of letting the system administrator set defaults he or she considers sane. I don't think this is being needlessly interactive. If invoked as in my example (register-window-manager /usr/bin/X11/fvwm2, for instace), all the user has to do is press enter once. And until we get our magic "interactive" flag, we can of course default to the non-interactive behavior. -- G. Branden Robinson | One man's "magic" is another man's Purdue University | engineering. "Supernatural" is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | null word. http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
pgpuD05H7D0hc.pgp
Description: PGP signature