James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I never said it was unstable and it isn't. But we haven't used it > before and I don't care how stable it is, we should not and will not > start recompiling core applications with a previously unused (*in > Debian*) library, one month into a freeze. The decision to postpone > PAM integration till 2.1 was made a long time ago (see the list > archives).
You're saying we shouldn't re-make that decision now. I guess that's fine. You're saying that when the decisions was made ("a long time ago") it was the right decision. I guess that's fine, too. However, I'm surprised that so much time had passed without anyone re-examining the decision. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]