Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: > Nah, leafnode does NOT deal with spam well (read: at all). slrnpull is > better at that. Probably why it should be split out of the slrn package.
Hmm, interesting idea. I'm willing to do this if there's any demand -- see shy jo, slrn maintainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
