[ Forwarded to debian-devel to see what other people think. ] The copyright for seyon says:
====================================================================== Seyon is Copyright (c) 1992 of Muhammad M. Saggaf. Seyon is not public domain. Permission is granted to use and distribute Seyon freely for any use and to sell it at any price without reference to the copyright owner provided that in all above cases Seyon is intact and is not made part of any program either in whole or in part and that this copyright notice is included with Seyon. Permission is also granted to modify the source as long as the modified source is not distributed. ====================================================================== I'm happy that we can work with this license, as we distribute diffs. Thomas thinks otherwise. Thoughts? -- Steve McIntyre, CURS CCE, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I sent ten dollars to death.net and all I got was... well, nothing. "Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, +------------------ "Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I..." |Finger for PGP key ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 13:22:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "T.E.Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#20914: seyon package copyright > Why not? I still don't see a problem. We do not change the upstream source > and then distribute it... (I've been here before): you're packaging it (original sources & fixes) together as seyon. -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]