Hi,
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> On 7 May 1998, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Dale> Whithout meaning to sound too negative, I want to caution
Dale> against such patch and fill design. Ian J. worked very hard (and
Dale> was very successful in my opinion) to design the current source
Dale> package format to manage the various problems of absorbing and
Dale> using upstream sources. We should be careful to craft any
Dale> "improvements" to that format in a consistant and smooth
Dale> fashion.
One of the co-maintainers of dpkg (Klee) has made an
experimental dpkg [not available widely, or outside the CVS
tree]). It has support for multiple upstream tar balls, multiple
patches to be applied in sequence using a custon unpack script (in
case one needs to move things around between pathces or whatever); it
has unpack-depends, and a separate build-depends. (It has other stuff
too, it is just that these points stuck in my memory).
Dale> That said, I am strongly in favor of a source dependency
Dale> scheme. It just needs to be workable.
I think this shall be workable. In fact, I think it is
working, at least for the author (I do not have access ot it
either). I would advocate patience. It is not as if we could change
the souce format in the middle of a freeze anyway.
manoj
--
To exist is to change, to change is to mature, to mature is to go on
creating oneself endlessly. -- Henri Bergson
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
