Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you take a look at the bug report, you'll see that there's a > workaround already in place for this bug, but the maintainer left the > bug report intact because he wants to find a cleaner solution. > > Hence this discussion of lpr <-> lprng is pretty much off-topic, and > distracting to the point in question.
If you look a bit closer, you'll see that the first message about a workaround was a followup to my suggestion of using lprng as an alternative. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
