> Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >And the upstream author also says we really should put 5.1 in hamm, > > and who would want to argue with him? > > I've just checked the 5.0 -> 5.1 changelog. Basically some a whole bunch of > errors have been fixedand Win32-support has been vastly improved, > > There are some new features though. I'll put the changelog below. > > Personally, I would like to see vim 5.1 in hamm, but that's just me. > As a vim-addict I'm somewhat subjective here. > > Wichert.
Well, as another vim addict, I would also like to see most secent stable release of VIM in hamm. (But on the other hand, as a real VIM addict, I always compile all the vim "alphas" myself - and with Motif GUI). In any case. if author thinks that including 5.1 is the way to go, I guess we should at least consider that. Alex Y. -- _ _( )_ ( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+ | _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets | \ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ | / \ \ +-------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]