Some time around Fri, 19 Jun 1998 19:49:58 PDT, Robert Woodcock wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 1998 at 11:39:20AM -0300, Igor Grobman wrote: > > Some time around Thu, 18 Jun 1998 19:36:17 PDT, Robert Woodcock wrote: > > > I did *not* fix the old source format [...] > > > > If it's the old source format, then is it still in hamm? I think every ot > her > > old-source format package is no longer in hamm. I don't see why p2c would > be > > the exception given that no one wants to maintain it anyway. Unless, of c > ourse > > you mean something different by "old source format" than what I am thinkin > g of > > (does it have a .dsc file?) > > Hmmm, I haven't been a developer long enough to know just what you're > talking about, but yes it does have a .dsc file. It seems the debian/rules > file predates debstd though.
Oh, so that's how you determine it ;-). The other explanation is that the person might have had enough clue not to use debstd ;-). If it has a .dsc file, it's new source format. The old one wouldn't have a debian/ dir either. > > Can someone who *does* know exactly what 'old source format' means look at > and possibly close bug #9514? #9514 complains it's old source format? I'll take a look at it if I have time left after reading my mail today :). -- Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation.... Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]