[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes: > I asked once earlier, but no one responded: > Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do know that we had backed out PAM-ifying hamm sometime last year. I think we should re-PAM-ify everything (i.e., pam version of login, passwd, etc etc). I think PAM is stable now and should be embraced for slink. But I could certainly be wrong. -- .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
