-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Santiago Vila wrote: > > But I believe that most of our users will agree that 2.0.7-1 is a much > > nicer version number than 2.0.7r-1 and would not mind to install a few > > packages by hand just *once*. > > It's not having to install a few packages by hand, it's breaking all > dependencies on libc6 2.0.7pre* which a lot of packages have.
Well, how many packages have a dependency like that which are not generated from the glibc package proper? Could please indentify them? [ I did not found many ]. > This would mean that all packages compiled with a pre-version must be > recompiled to fix their dependencies. True, but if there are not many of them, it could be not so bad, after all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNY5CASqK7IlOjMLFAQGlFQQAtCci0bBKxF2m89qux3a6/+DUURpGSnY/ QJZgjCvwRQn0JZjIXxOcLiHVbYWzEG4uh55UXkJVQqij2h3AfvFFntmnxd5+dFxl G61bVY2Uzg/4+Qwj+2nTc9Eyvz0jaKabtrr+e+Zi/X3raBs++SBOBAfDpG6mcYgm 66oSogrMUQ8= =RXJ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]