I think it's not necessary that a developer agree with the DFSG. It should be enough that they indicate they understand it and will abide by it in what they produce for debian.
-- see shy jo
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free... Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-... Ossama Othman
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re:... Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re:... Branden Robinson
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-d... Darren Benham
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-d... Craig Sanders
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> ... Ossama Othman
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --&... Craig Sanders
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free... David Welton
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-d... Ossama Othman
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> ... Joey Hess
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --&... Chris Waters
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --&... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-d... Ossama Othman
