>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 00:52:12 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
Wichert> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>] For the Nth Wichert> time our logo license has expired. It might be a good idea Wichert> to finally finalize the license instead of just extending Wichert> its lifetime every couple of months. Wichert> There has also been mention of people wanting a different Wichert> logo. I think we should stick to our current logo for Wichert> several reasons though: Wichert> * it is a good logo: it's easily recognizable, simple to Wichert> draw, scales good and looks good in both black&white and Wichert> in colour. Wichert> * choosing a new logo will take a long time: we would have Wichert> to get submissions, vote on them all over again, etc. Wichert> * I actually like the thing :) Wichert> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the Wichert> current license. Since this seems to be a formal proposal. I second. I'd like to see an end to the issue once and for all. I see two different votes here: 1) A formal logo license that Debian will use. and 2) What we do about the logo (with options a) keep current, b) keep current for some amount of time, c) get new one in some manner). Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach