On Feb 1, 1999, Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 12:19:48PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> > to do one of the above, the most sensible is to steal RH's patch so that >> > we are compatible. >> I agree. Option 1 is definitely the best. > Now to convince David Engel ... I wish you more luck than you had with me! Serious. But I may contribute a bit of stubbornness, if you wish :-D BTW, even if you decide to adopt RH's patch, it doesn't mean I'm not going to accept a patch that drops implicit rpath flags for libraries listed in ld.so.conf (or just in sys_lib_search_path_spec, for a start). I'd implement it myself if I were not so much overloaded with academic issues. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org} Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
