On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:54:32AM +0000, David Coe wrote: > Is that still an accurate description of the legal status (from > FSF's perspective) of XEmacs, and if so, shouldn't we move it to > non-free?
Huh? RMS is just complaining that they chose not to assign copyright to the FSF. It's still GPL. There's no real question on the freedom of XEmacs. David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
