> Or are you saying something else? I was merely pointing out the irony of one of Craig's packages not enabling the daemon by default.
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Clint Adams
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Bjoern Brill
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Francois Gurin
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Daniel Burrows
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Raul Miller
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Clint Adams
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Raul Miller
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Clint Adams
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Clint Adams
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Michael Stone
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Raul Miller
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... The Doctor What
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Craig Sanders
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate... Clint Adams