Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we step into the "patents make something non-free" trap, then we 
> probably have a lot of things in main that should be moved to 
> non-free because they technically infringe on someone's stupid patent.

Living in the UK, where there are currently no software patenets, I tend to
agree with you. But there is some inconsistancy, for example all the gif that
is in non-free because of patents.

-- 
I consume, therefore I am

Attachment: pgp7VRzSf3p51.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to