On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 12:30:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Just having /bin/sh included in the .deb is Good Enough -- diversions > > > work as designed. > > Good Enough is not good enough (TM).
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:55:54PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > *shrug* Name a case where it fails. You don't remember the problems when libreadline broke? Or, to address your implicit question rather than your explicit question: Bash is an order of magnitude more complex than what's needed for /bin/sh -- this results in efficiency problems and results in a number of potential reliability problems. -- Raul