On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:04:26PM +0000, Paul M Sargent wrote: > > > If the kernel isn't even in the archive then potential problems aren't > > > going to be found. > > > > I wouldn't put that much `weight' in the fact that kernel is in the archive: > > kernel packages don't get upgraded to new upstream versions, so if you want > > a new kernel, you have to make the decision to install it, on your own. > > But don't you think it's good to have the base system in place as soon as > possible for a new development cycle. It's putting a stake in the ground. If > somebody sees kernel-image-2.3.58 in the archive then it suggests they > should be giving it a go.
Hm, yes, I agree, it has a psycological effect. OTOH, maybe we don't want to put that stake into the ground until potato has been released, for obvious reasons. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name