> Similarly, I have packaged devfsd (http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/). > This one still needs a couple of problems ironing out first.
No offense, but I hope you realize the amount of effort that will be needed for devfsd. Since it is a key element in our 2.4.x upgrade path, the amount of policy and technical bugs will be tremendous (permissions, adding support for default compatibility devices, etc..). I just don't want to see anyone go lightly into packaging devfsd. If you aren't prepared to take on the responsiblity of what will most likely become a base and essential package, leave it for some one else to do. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
