* Jimmy O'Regan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000829 22:40]: > ) But are there any features that > ) mutt and slrn do not offer yet? > How about "it's pine" ;)
No further questions. ;-) > Problem is though, the discussion about the IMAPD license > started with rms mentioning that the FSF had tried to > resurrect pine 3.91, and were threatened with a lawsuit by UW, > who interpret the X type license pine 3.91 was under as being > the same as the current pine license (he wanted someone to > check if they assumed the same with X type license on IMAPD). Sheesh. "Death of Pine predicted. [EMAIL PROTECTED]" Just to end the crosspoting between individuals and mailing lists: Followup-To: comp.mail.misc ? Sven
