On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Anthony, > > > > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that > > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's > > using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written > > scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is > > astonishing. It would probably really help if we want to regenerate > > [...] > > I just looked at the load on master (=bugs.debian.org). It's > averaging around 8 or 9, and running top, I saw times when there were > about 10 copies of {bug,pkg}report.cgi running simultaneously. I > think that if the BTS is moving to dynamically generated pages only, > mod_perl is going to be a necessity. > > I don't have much time right now, but I'd be happy to help when I do > (in October, most likely). > > Julian > It's easy to set up. I'll do it after the scripts have stabilized.
-- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]