Christian Leutloff wrote:
> 
> Igor Grobman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > It is my belief that the maintainer
> > should know exactly what's going with his package.
> 
> I don't *want* to know that! 
> [...]
> I want to get good packages with the least possible afford for the
> maintainer. I can drive a car with out knowing how the machine
> works. Why shouldn't I pack a program for Debian without knowing about
> the things that scripts can do for me????
> 

But here you're not playing the car-driver role.
You're playing the car-repair role.
So I read your statement as :
   ## I can repair a car without knowing how the machine works.
and feel it's absurd.
Will you bring your car to a car-repair who puts this statement on the
wall?


Fabrizio
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
> Just because Red Hat do it doesn't mean it's a good idea. [Ian J.]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Reply via email to