At (time_t)1032615395 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously John R. Daily wrote: > > * FOP is also packaged, but I wouldn't advocate using its output. > > What is wrong with it?
Just generally poor quality. As an example, with a recent version my table of contents only had roughly half the page numbers it should have, so it would look something like: 1 Foo .............. 1.1 Bar .............. 1.1.1 Baz .............. 2 (The above is from vague memory.) It seems like a product with much work ahead of it before it becomes generally useful. Perhaps a stylesheet with a targetted subset of FO would help matters. -John
