Josip Rodin said: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:52:22PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > > > strong -> emphasis > > > em -> emphasis : -- : emphasis > > > > I think <emphasis> is right for both. > > Wouldn't that make it convert into HTML as <em>? I.e. we lose the > useful distinction (bold vs italic).
You're right ... <strong> could instead go to <emphasis role="strong"> or to <emphasis role="bold">. Andrew. -- Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh."
