On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:33:21AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > At the time of writting those functions, I made them more strict, and > not allowing unknown architectures was on purpose. But I suppose I > don't have such a strong position on this, and could just apply this > patch... what do you think, Frank?
I don't find it unreasonable to somehow warn about unknown architectures but the current code errors out completly and gives a very misleading error message. So in my opinion the patch is an improvement. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
