Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:37:55 +0200
with message-id <20090416183755.ga...@rivendell>
and subject line Re: Bug#387290: dpkg: incorrect parsing of version-headers in
status-file
has caused the Debian Bug report #387290,
regarding dpkg: incorrect parsing of version-headers in status-file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
387290: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387290
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Hello,
while "dselect install" I get:
...
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
dpkg: version 'Outputs the version of the Word format a document is stored' has
bad syntax: version string has embedded spaces
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Extracting templates from packages: 100%
...
The only line matching this string in /var/lib/dpkg/status is from
the description of Package: wv:
* wvVersion: Outputs the version of the Word format a document is stored
in.
Looks like some missing ^ (begin-of-line) match in the status-parser.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
<snupidity> bjmg: ja, logik ist mein fachgebiet. das liegt im gen
<uepsie> in welchem?
<snupidity> im zweiten X
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The only line matching this string in /var/lib/dpkg/status is from
> > the description of Package: wv:
> > * wvVersion: Outputs the version of the Word format a document is stored
> > in.
> >
> > Looks like some missing ^ (begin-of-line) match in the status-parser.
>
> This description has been in the repositories for a long time and no
> one else reported any problem. Without more information, like the
> offending dpkg db, it's rather difficult to track this down in case
> it's really a dpkg bug. It could well be a corrupted status file or
> similar.
>
> Marking as unreproducible and moreinfo for now, otherwise I guess we
> should close it after a while.
Closing now.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny :
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/
--- End Message ---
