Your message dated Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:32:11 +0100
with message-id <200911070832.11172.peter.fritzs...@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: [dpkg-dev] Please blacklist e...@base
has caused the Debian Bug report #554852,
regarding [dpkg-dev] Please blacklist e...@base
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
554852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.4.1
Severity: wishlist
When compiling with binutils-gold a new symbol with the name e...@base is
added. It is currently unknown why it gets added and a request to get more
information about it was send to #553435 and forwarded to
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10876
Could you consider to add this symbol to the blacklist file?
The initial idea to do so came Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/11/msg00249.html
Test output with binutils-gold:
$ objdump -w -f -p -T -R /usr/lib/libxyz.so.0.0.0|grep 'end$'
00000000000108d8 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base end
00000000000108d8 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base _end
and with old binutils
$ objdump -w -f -p -T -R /usr/lib/libxyz.so.0.0.0|grep 'end$'
000000000020f860 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base _end
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstable ftp.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
================================-+-============
dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | 1.15.4.1
perl5 |
perl-modules | 5.10.1-6
bzip2 | 1.0.5-3
lzma | 4.43-14
patch (>= 2.2-1) | 2.5.9-5
make | 3.81-7
binutils | 2.20-2
libtimedate-perl | 1.1900-1
Recommends (Version) | Installed
==============================-+-===========
gcc | 4:4.3.4-1
OR c-compiler |
build-essential | 11.4
fakeroot | 1.14.3
gnupg | 1.4.10-2
gpgv | 1.4.10-2
Suggests (Version) | Installed
=================================-+-===========
debian-keyring | 2009.08.27
debian-maintainers |
From 3b5ec4f19e54674943d8e4a4f1fd7775b2634fc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:29:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Blacklist e...@base symbol generated by binutils-gold
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelm...@gmx.de>
---
scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs/SymbolFile.pm | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs/SymbolFile.pm b/scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs/SymbolFile.pm
index 41e1702..b097054 100644
--- a/scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs/SymbolFile.pm
+++ b/scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs/SymbolFile.pm
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ my %blacklist = (
'_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_' => 1, # sparc, alpha
'_SDA2_BASE_' => 1, # powerpc
'_SDA_BASE_' => 1, # powerpc
+ 'end' => 1, # ALL
);
for (my $i = 14; $i <= 31; $i++) {
--
1.6.5.2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> When compiling with binutils-gold a new symbol with the name e...@base is
> added. It is currently unknown why it gets added and a request to get more
> information about it was send to #553435 and forwarded to
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10876
>
> Could you consider to add this symbol to the blacklist file?
>
> The initial idea to do so came Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> from
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/11/msg00249.html
>
>
> Test output with binutils-gold:
> $ objdump -w -f -p -T -R /usr/lib/libxyz.so.0.0.0|grep 'end$'
> 00000000000108d8 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base end
> 00000000000108d8 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base _end
>
> and with old binutils
> $ objdump -w -f -p -T -R /usr/lib/libxyz.so.0.0.0|grep 'end$'
> 000000000020f860 g D *ABS* 0000000000000000 Base _end
Please ignore it. It is a bug in binutils-gold 2.20-2 and need not be fixed by
dpkg-dev. See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10876 for more
informations.
Best regards,
Peter
--- End Message ---
