+++ Raphael Hertzog [2011-03-24 14:31 +0100]: > Hi, > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Wookey wrote: > > It is probably not hard to enforce this at a slightly higher level. > > Indeed, it may make sense to just parse any string after the :, then > > have higher-level checks for valid values. The multiarch spec > > explicitly says to reject anything other than :any (in depends) for now, > > but in the > > future this syntax will be used to allow cross-architecture > > dependencies so any valid architecture name should be accepted. > > I don't think I want to enforce it at a higher level. deps_parse() should > be modified to accept a new parameter so that we know what to accept > or not. And we enforce it either within deps_parse or within > Dpkg::Deps::Simple.
OK, sounds sensible. I've never looked at this code before yesterday so defer entirely on what the best way to treat this stuff is :-) > > This patch is intended to be a simple implementation that allows > > packages with this info to be used with the build-tools, and > > ultimately uploaded to the archive (once a few more dependency-parsing > > packages have been fixed) - nothing more. > > We already have a patch very similar to yours in the multiarch branch. Can > you develop your patch so that it applies on top of the existing one? > > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dpkg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pu/multiarch/full > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=23efdcadd7c3fea81079e65ff3a89de37feb0c58 OK. I realised after posting this that there was already some very similar code in dpkg 1.16.0 in natty. So I did a patch against that here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/741433 which is probably very close to what you are asking for. I'll check aginst git though. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
