On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > First line is always > > the source entry. > > Do you want this constraint part of the definition or a implementation > detail?
I don't really care. I think it's cleaner to always have it first but I don't think it matters much. On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 09:52:38AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > But apparently the wanna-build team would like to have this information as > > well (to know which source packages build arch: all packages). So I'm > > going to add it and I'll follow you advice of replacing spaces by > > commas. That way we still have the possibility to add supplementary > > columns in the future if needed. > > On second thought, I think it is time to make this a key-value list > instead of bare values. Then we can add or remove values without > disrupting other users of the infos. Also a vendor may explicitely add > new values if they think they need it. That would be overkill. Vendor already have the option to add supplementary fields[1] so I don't see whey they would have to also be able add values in that field in particular. Cheers, [1] And Ubuntu uses it for Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed in .changes. -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
