On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > Well, I would say that technically each BRANCH is available as > origin/BRANCH, with no refs/ prefix. The refs/ prefix, and the > implementation of references as a tiny directory tree below .git, are > implementation details which should not be visible to the general user > who should be accessing these things using only appropriate git > commands.
You would be right if it was "refs/origin" but I see "remotes/origin/". And a remote branch is something significant in git usage since it doesn't appear in "git branch". Anyway, there's two correct formulations for me: 1/ Any other branches will be available under `remotes/origin/` 2/ Any other branches will be available as `remotes/origin/<name>` I was suggesting you to pick the one you prefer and to update your patch. TIA for your help. > It's lucky we're not writing a book together: it would take us years > to finish each page! Please, there's no reason to be unpleasant with me. I did not attack you. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
