Hi, On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote: > What do you think about taking this further and supporting expressions like > cpuattr:value (or cpuattr-value, or cpuattr=value, or whatever other syntax) > in the architecture wildcards (Dpkg::Arch::debarch_is()). In this particular > case: > > * endian:little and endian:big > * bits:32 and bits:64 > > As a result, arch symbol tag, [] expressions and Architecture fields in > debian/control etc. would gain support for this automatically. In my opinion, > this would be more flexible in the long term.
The idea seems nice but I'm not sure it's going to make the implementation any cleaner. And I don't see really the need for it in other places where we currently use architecture wildcards. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
