Hi!

On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:40:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:17:23 +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> > This provides some examples on using dpkg-buildflags and buildflags.mk
> > in debian/rules, notes that --export=make is not recommended and
> > explicitly mentions that the list of build flags is subject to change.
> > 
> > Closes: #657627
> 
> Thanks for the patch. I'll look how to best combine this with the patch
> Jonathan provided in #691449 (which is sitting in my local tree) in the
> coming days.

On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 01:12:34 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 02:53:57 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > That's fair.  I first tried putting this in the description of the
> > --export option but it felt too long.
> 
> Right, I see what you mean. But what seems to me to be clutterering
> it a bit, are the examples. :)
> 
> > It didn't seem right in the examples section, either, because the
> > examples don't illustrate other aspects of how to use dpkg-buildflags
> > properly (for example, the text doesn't mention bug#327154).
> 
> Oh, sure, although I do think adding a note for the $(shell) issue
> and an example for that would be worthwile (or other caveats or usage
> patterns you might have in mind?), afterall this kind of shell quoting
> stuff seems to usually trip people over.
> 
> > Here's another try at putting it in the description of --export.  What
> > do you think?
> 
> Certainly an improvement, although I'm not yet sold on the embedded
> examples, it would probably also make more sense to format them all
> in the same way too. And thanks for bearing with my pickyness? :)

Ok, I've merged these two patches with some modifications, you can see
the result in:

  
<http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=blob;f=man/dpkg-buildflags.1;hb=HEAD>

The commits:

  
<http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=eb25201f1dc115d2cc9652ed0213d80806f1ca03>
  
<http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f95a795d310d35d89b1060406236d81dd9b8da0>

Please, let me know if it looks good to you? Jonathan, I'll try to add
a mention of #327154 too, if no one provides a patch first. :)

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to