Hello Sven, On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > Am 12.01.2023 um 11:29 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > > Package: dpkg-dev > > Version: 1.21.17 > > Severity: normal > > > > I got a linitian error for my package (linuxinfo) that the upstream > > signature is missing and should be put alongside the .orig.tar.xz > > during the build. > > > > This worked, the signature was included in the .changes file. However, > > it is not included in the .dsc file. > > I cannot reproduce this. If I provide the upstream signature as > linuxinfo_4.1.2.orig.tar.xz.asc, it ends up in both the .changes and the > .dsc files. The .changes file for linuxinfo 4.1.2-1 which you uploaded[1] > does not contain it.
Maybe we use the tools differently?
Since we use source only uploads, I run:
dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-S
And I screwed up linuxinfo 4.1.2-1, thus I decided to also include the
signature and tried to do 4.1.2-2 (which failed) and manually added it
in 4.1.2-3 (which is now in the archive).
> > No I need to inform dpkg-buildpackage how to add this, however, I
> > cannot find any option to do so.
>
> Neither can I, but I do not really see the need for it.
For now, I noticed down to add the asc file manually, but I don't
think this is a desirable solution.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
