Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:51:32 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line conffile handling already sophisticated
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 1998 13:02:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 32063 invoked from network); 16 Jan 1998 13:02:47 -0000
Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@131.114.193.182)
by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 16 Jan 1998 13:02:47 -0000
Received: by pot.cnuce.cnr.it
id m0xtBQ1-00081iC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2); Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:02:41 +0100
(CET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:02:41 +0100 (CET)
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: better handling of config files
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.4.0.19
Severity: wishlist
dpkg should keep a checksum of installet config files. When
installing a package, it should remind the user that an installed
config file is different from the original one. Moreover, the default
of whether to overwrite or not should depend on this.
