Tim Dijkstra writes ("dpkg 2.0?"): > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:33:48 +0100 > Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How is dpkg development going atm? ... > A while ago there was some talk about dpkg 2.0, some nice looking > documents (written by ubuntu IIRC), with interesting ideas. Was this > just talk, or are there any serious plan of a major rewrite? I haven't > seen any discussions on this list about it ...
`dpkg 2.0' is a marketing term, AFAICT, and doesn't represent a plan to do a rewrite - rather, a plan to add features. The dpkg code is quite old, and badly abused by one particularly prolific previous maintainer, so it is in need of an overhaul by an expert C programmer. But a rewrite ought not to be on the cards IMO. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]