On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > I'm guess this discussiong is slowly leaving debian-dpkg@ topic, > though...
Definitely not. I plan to integrate VCS knowledge in dpkg-dev at some point and I like those discussions so that I can make up my mind on what's best. Up to know I was rather thinking of designing a new tool "vcs-buildpackage" but maybe I simply want to create new source formats "3.0 (git2quilt)" or "3.0 (bzr2quilt)" and extend the dpkg-source integration in dpkg-buildpackage. Those new formats would create a "3.0 (quilt)" source package but would require a git or bzr repository to do its work. We could create debian/source/local-options to contain the options that should not be incorporated in the exported source package and which are really specific either to the VCS or to the maintainer preference. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/ My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100328094342.gh14...@rivendell
