* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110912 20:44]: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes we > > > just need to rebuild on a single architecture (because something > > > strange has happend there), and I don't want to get rid of that > > > ability. > > > The more I think about it, the more I think we should move the binNMU > > changelog out of /usr/share/doc and allow co-installation of different > > binNMU versions of multi-arch: same packages. (IOW: agreed) > > Any reason not to ship it as /usr/share/doc/$pkg/changelog.$arch? (I.e., I > think /usr/share/doc is still the right place for it, even if it can't be > changelog.Debian.gz anymore.)
I would rather do /usr/share/doc/$pkg/changelog.$arch.$binNMU - but well, YMMV. Anyways, I think that dpkg-deb should inject this files e.g. from an entry in the control file. Otherwise, it might be too difficult to get this done. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110912191929.gg4...@mails.so.argh.org
