Hi,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > So are you suggesting that dpkg should use ${binary:Package} ?
> > Could you patch /usr/sbin/popularity-contest line 161 to add binary: and
> > check whether
> > it works correctly ?
> >
> > Or did I misunderstand something ?
>
> This only helps for the libc6-i686:i386 m-a same case (but it does
> help there). It doesn't for the mksh:i386 m-a foreign case.
>
> dpkg devs cc'ed in the hope that they can contribute why -L behaves
> differently and how one should solve this…
This is definitely a bug in dpkg (for "dpkg -L mksh"). The default naming
of foreign non-"multi-arch: same" packages changed and the input side was
not adapted to cope with it.
Thanks for reporting. I will look into it later.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120214082147.gb10...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
