2013-11-08 18:10, Guillem Jover: > I forgot to mention that given that the messages are currently > localized, it might make sense to use Message-L10n or similar to make > that clear, and to possibly allow non-localized messages in the future. > OTOH I think apt is currently interested in the non-localized messages > only to be able to filter some of them, so maybe doing that would be > trying to fix the wrong thing?
Yeah, it might be useful to have both localized and non-localized ones if it's easy to do. For example, if I want to show all errors to users but filter some for package manager purposes. > > b) to specify the format of <package-name> (an example suggests it would > > be always fully qualified "package:architecture", but explicitly saying > > this would be nice); > > Also forgot to mention this on my previous mail. Would you prefer > having it arch-qualified or the information properly split into > another Architecture field? A separate 'Architecture' field is my slight preference in a spirit of deb822 format, but either sounds fine. > Eugene (and the others too), any more information you think might make > your life easier? Either new events or fields? Nothing more from me right now I guess, this already sounds like a good step forward. Just a plug on making life easier, some resolved wishlist items from other areas would be also great :P -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++ GNU/Linux userspace developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131108185852.GC22478@debian-w500.Elisa