On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:34:07PM +0000, Jessica Clarke wrote: > unless you want porters to have to > manually build gettext with the nojava profile every time a new version > is uploaded
The reverse of that would be: "Unless you want every package maintainer to manually track the java stuff every time a new architecture becomes java-enabled or java-disabled). I think there are less people porting than people maintaining packages using "nojava", so yes, I think porters defining nojava in their environments would be a much better solution. Thanks.