On 08/06/22 at 21:07 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I think I take more issue with non-dgit git-first workflows than with > dgit ones, because dgit is so well documented and is a workflow that is > already shared by a noticeable fraction of the archive.
I'm curious: how do you measure dgit usage? You cannot just look at the list of repositories at https://browse.dgit.debian.org/, since that just says that at some point in the past, someone used dgit to work on that package, right? For example, the keepass2 package has a repo there, but it is completely outdated compared to what is in unstable. Lucas
