Am Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2007 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Kurt Gramlich] > > > i disagree with the handling of contributers in the debian edu > > wiki page > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/roadmap > > > > - * Bug:1064 samba configuration needs to be corrected for domain > > logons > > > > just to delete this line without discussion demotivates people
Don't worry about my motivation ;-) I'm still alive but under heavy load @work > > Why? Do you mean that all bugs should be listed in the roadmap? If > not, what make this bug special and in need of a listing in the > roadmap? Nothing makes it special. It was written there, because there was a sentence like: 'here we collect things for ...', if I remember correctly. So I believed that it may be something like a notepad for things to remeber and wrote down that this point (the bug # 1064) is in my opinion still an important one. > Why is it it not enough motivation to have it listed in > bugzilla? Nobody said that, why do you ask? The point is Kurt's disagree in his first sentence :'I disagree with the handling of contributers ...'. And as the contributor I say:' it is not the fine english art to wipe away content and declare then a kind of prohibition afterwards in place for further editing.' But, it's a wiki, so if I don't agree with that kind of prohibition, I'm free to wipe it away. And AFAIK is the debian wiki not a protected site for registered users. As it was not the first time, minds from contributors have been wiped out without discussion or notes, I don't worry about, because I know who did it. ;-) > The roadmap is not ment to list all the bugs we want to > fix (we got bugzilla and the priority system there to track that), it > is for planned features and improvements. And so it was ment, as a reminder for improvement. This BUG was opened 2006-02-19 21:38. So it is an older one and it was discussed several times. So my note of the BUG on the wikipage was ment as a reminder like on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Etch > > I believe that the samba config work with Windows XP. Is this wrong? Maybe it works, I didn't test it since months. But others wrote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] that, in short, that they aren't satisfied with the provided concept of the implementation of samba in debian-edu. So there is a need of improvement, I believe. > The bug seem to talk about Windows 9x and NT, and I believe neither > is supported by Microsoft any more. Is the windows machines affected > by this bug still supported by Microsoft? If you read bug #1064 at http://bugs.skolelinux.no/1064 in detail, you can see that with NT are all versions ment, that are _not_ win9x. > > > it is important, to get R1 runing without problems with window > > workstations, that means a corrected and improved smb.conf Over all said above, more thinking before deleting is saving time and nerves ;-) Greetings to all, Jürgen Leibner
