On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:45:42PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:07:48PM +0200, Klaus Knopper wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:02:26PM +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote: > >>so the conclusion is the same simple one as stated much earlier > >>in this thread: so far nobody has shown up who is willing (and > >>able) to do the integration work (and the maintenance) to get > >>CipUX into Skolelinux. > >> > >>It's not that CipUX is not wanted, but without manpower to get > >>the work done there is simply no chance. > [snip] > >Good summary. I think we got now to the core of the problem, just no > >solution yet. > > > >Well, I'll continue to search for packagers, and meanwhile we will > >continue to maintain our own repository which may not be > >compliant, but legitimate. ;-) > > Phillip did *not* mention packaging, but integration with Skolelinux > and ongoing maintainance of that integration. > > In other words, it is a Skolelinux-specific task, not a general > Debian task. > > Even if you consider CATweasel a crucial and mandatory part of your > CipUX stack, the parts _below_ CATweasel, the ones in the CipUX > project, needs to be integrated first - as was pointed out by others > in this thread. > > So yes, CATweasel is not in Debian, so needs packaging, but no, > CipUX itself has a packaging team already (me and Xavier, > currently).
Thanks for clarification, but now the next question arises: You are talking about Debian packaging for squeeze, not packaging for/inside Skolelinux/lenny following the HOWTO that Jürgen referred to, correct? You can maybe answer this in my previous mail where I basially asked the same question. :-) Regards -Klaus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
