Hi Holger et. al,
[cc debian-science, related post:
<URL:https://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2013/06/msg00177.html>]
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:54:05PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 14. Juni 2013, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > libticables-1.3.4
> > libtifiles-1.1.6
> > libticonv-1.1.4
> > libticalcs-1.1.8
> > gfm-1.07
> > tilp2-1.17
> > ... perhaps some more ...
>
> those are all source packages? If so, I would prefer to have them added to a
> subdirectory in the debian-edu git directory on alioth.
>
I had a look at the debian-science alioth repository, they use a
subdirectory 'packages' for packaging [1]. So I suggest to follow
that convention and put the source packages in debian-edu/packages/
like:
debian-edu/packages/libticables
debian-edu/packages/libtifiles
debian-edu/packages/libticonv
debian-edu/packages/libticalcs
debian-edu/packages/gfm
debian-edu/packages/tilp2
When taking a look at debian-science, I realized that the packages fit
also there (Data Acquisition/Hardware). What is the better fitting
team? Any oppinions on that topic?
Best regards,
Andi
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?a=project_list;pf=debian-science/packages
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615081223.GA23748@fuzi
